PSNet.biz
Oct 22, 2019
Edited: Oct 22, 2019

Industry to USDA: Where are the Federal Hemp Regulations?



The hemp industry continues to look for federal guidance on production for 2020.

It’s been more than a month since Hemp Industry Daily first reported that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) had completed its draft of the federal hemp production rules and submitted it to the White House Office of Budget and Management, which reviews all regulations adopted and implemented by a presidential administration.

After hearing that news, the industry anticipated the USDA regulations would soon be released.

But since then, there’s been little to no word on when to expect the USDA rules, though Denver-based cannabis attorney Garrett Graff of Hoban Law Group told Hemp Industry Daily it’s likely the rules will be forthcoming within the next month.

That time frame reportedly was endorsed by a top USDA official last week during a Senate Agriculture Committee hearing.

“As you might imagine with anything at the federal government level, things move slowly, and oftentimes there’s false alarms and expectations that might go by the wayside,” Graff said.

“We still hold promise that the federal government will get the regulations implemented sooner versus later.”

Graff said that at one point the USDA was suggesting it would release the regulations in November, but then the timeline was moved up to Aug. 1. Now, it looks as if the original November date was more accurate.

And amid other pressing federal issues – including the U.S. House of Representatives’ formal impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump – hemp production guidance isn’t exactly taking precedence.

“To be entirely candid, that may very much have something to do with all the other goings-on in Washington DC unrelated to hemp,” Graff said.

“As important as this is to the hemp industry, and we feel that burn very directly, it’s but one of many things that folks in DC are handling.

“And so, unfortunately, it’s not always an issue utmost importance to them.”

A USDA spokesperson reached by Hemp Industry Daily declined to talk on the record about the holdup, saying only that the agency is “exercising due diligence” in getting the rules ready.


What if the Regulations are Delayed?

Since March, the USDA has assured the hemp industry that it would release production rules this fall, in time for farmers to make plans for the 2020 production season.

But what happens if the rules continue to be delayed?

According to Graff:

  • The hemp industry would continue to operate under the 2014 Farm Bill, and U.S. states with established hemp production programs would continue the status quo.

  • States with new legislation based on the 2018 Farm Bill that specifically referenced the need to submit a hemp plan to the USDA before cultivation can begin would be hamstrung by a lack of federal regulations.

  • Pain points needing clarity within the industry, including certified genetics, confirmation that interstate transport is allowed and clarification on how THC testing will be carried out in a universally consistent form across the country, would remain unclear.

Even if regulations aren’t released within the next month, the industry will continue to operate, Graff said.

“It would be ideal if the USDA regulations were in place within the next 60 days because most state legislatures enter into legislative session in early January,” giving states time to update their own hemp rules to comply, Graff said.

The USDA has 60 days to approve each state’s hemp plan.

“As long as those state hemp plans are being evaluated by the USDA early next year, I still believe that there would be sufficient time to uphold the stated goal of the USDA, which is to have all these plans in place in time for planting season come next April, May and June,” Graff said.

But for farmers, waiting until the last minute for regulations is not ideal or even realistic, according to Steven Turetsky, general manager for Colorado-based Shi Farms.

“You’re really racing against the clock then,” he said.

“Let’s say that the (USDA) plans come out January and states start to enact those regulations in February and open up applications. I can’t imagine people will start getting licenses till April, when you’re almost at planting season, so how do you go about buying seed and determine your strategy that late in the game?” Turetsky told Hemp Industry Daily.

“I’m sure the USDA gets it, but I hope they’re listening and hearing that if they want farmers to be successful – which is part of their job as an agency – they have to understand the timing and act swiftly to make sure everyone can have an opportunity to succeed in 2020.”


Many Questions Still Unanswered for Farmers

Turetsky said that while farmers are currently focused in on the 2019 harvest and selling their crops, they’re also trying to plan for 2020 and having the USDA regulations would provide clarity on how to move forward and at what scale.

“I have investors that have growth plans, and (Turetsky’s Shi Farms) have growth plans, and we’re trying to circle the wagons and determine our strategy.”

He added that when it comes to determining which genetics to use for 2020, changes in aspects of the USDA regulations such as THC levels and testing are especially important.

Krystal Snyder, a commercial horticulture educator for Pennsylvania State University Extension, said farmers in her state are also uncertain about moving forward with their plans for 2020. Specifically, farmers are asking about:

• Whether there will be rules for required distance between grain and fiber hemp farms and CBD farms; • Whether smokable flower production will continue to be a legal product, considering some state bans in development; and • Which pesticides will be labeled for hemp production.

Snyder said her state still has not communicated when it will begin permitting farmers for 2020 hemp production licenses or making any changes to the process or cost for the program. Many states are holding up licensing until the USDA rules are presented.

University research is also on hold, as dollars have not yet been allocated for hemp research, Snyder said.


States are Making Their Own Plans

Meanwhile, in the absence of federal guidance for hemp production from the USDA as well as the use of CBD in food, beverages and dietary supplements from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), states are moving forward with their own preparations for the 2020 season:

  • Ohio and Missouri have released their proposed hemp plans for the 2020 production season for public comment.Florida has completed its rulemaking process for hemp production and is ready for final review.

  • Alabama and other states have started accepting applications for their 2020 hemp programs. Alabama’s agriculture department expects to double the number of farmers licensed in 2019 for the upcoming season.

  • Illinois has proposed a bill that would require all CBD products to meet testing requirements set by the state’s agriculture department. Right now, the FDA doesn’t heavily regulate CBD testing.


Written By: Laura Drotleff

Original Article: https://hempindustrydaily.com/industry-to-usda-where-are-the-federal-regulations/

0 comments0 replies
New Posts
  • PSNet.biz
    Nov 23, 2019

    Senators Push USDA To Adopt Changes To Hemp Regulations

    Discussion 
    Sens. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Jeff Merkley (D-OR) sent a letter to the head of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) on Wednesday, requesting a series of changes to draft rules for hemp that the department released last month . The senators said they appreciate that USDA issued the proposed regulations, which is a “necessary step to establish a domestic federal hemp production program.” However, they wanted to highlight “several concerns about the unintended and potentially harmful effects this interim final rule would have on hemp production in Oregon and across the country.” In the letter to Agriculture Sec. Sonny Perdue, they listed five issues with the regulations and suggested potential fixes. Many of the concerns echoed those that stakeholders have submitted to USDA as part of a public comment period the department launched on October 31. Here’s what the senators highlighted: —As written, the draft rules call for hemp to be tested within 15 days before harvest. Farmers have argued that’s far too little time, and the senators said it presents an “impossible obstacle for growers to overcome.” Oregon regulations require testing within 28 days, so they said USDA should adopt a similar timeline. —USDA said that testing must be completed at a laboratory registered with the Drug Enforcement Administration. The senators said that will produce a bottleneck and delays for hemp producers, and that independent laboratories such as those operating in Oregon should be allowed to conduct the tests. —The senators said that USDA should allow for forms of THC concentration testing that do not involve post-decarboxylation and also argued that the congressional intent of hemp legalization was not to require testing of all THC compounds but rather just delta-9 THC in particular. —USDA requires that testing samples come from the top one-third of the flower portion of the plant. Instead, the senators said, samples should follow established protocol in states like Oregon, which stipulates that samples should be taken from the flowering tops when they’re present and be eight inches long. —While the Farm Bill defines hemp as cannabis containing no more than 0.3 percent THC on a dry weight basis, USDA gave slight margin of error and considers any plants with more than 0.5 percent THC to be in violation of the regulations. Farmers have called that limitation arbitrary and the senators said it would be more reasonable to set the negligence threshold at 1 percent, if there must be a THC restriction at all. “Farmers in Oregon and across the country are on the precipice of an agricultural boom that, with the right regulatory framework, stands to boost rural economies in every corner of the country,” they wrote . Wyden and Merkley have been some of the most vocal proponents of developing USDA regulations that bolster the hemp industry since the passage of the Farm Bill, through which they worked to legalize the crop in the first place. As early as February, Wyden and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) were knocking at USDA’s door, urging the department to expedite the rulemaking process . Read the full senators’ letter to USDA on hemp regulations on our blog. Written By: Kyle Jaeger Original Article: https://www.marijuanamoment.net/senators-push-usda-to-adopt-five-changes-to-proposed-hemp-regulations/
  • PSNet.biz
    Nov 22, 2019

    FDA: More Data Needed Before CBD Regulation

    Discussion 
    Federal health regulators say the lack of scientific data about cannabidiol explains their delay issuing new guidance on over-the-counter CBD. The  U.S. Food and Drug Administration continues to accept comments on hemp- and cannabis-derived ingredients, months after the comment period closed, according to Sharon Lindan Mayl, senior policy adviser in the FDA’s Office of Food Policy and Response. Mayl said this week that the FDA needs more data about CBD, despite the more than 4,500 comments it has received since it began its review of regulations for hemp-derived CBD. A  landmark public meeting  about cannabis at FDA headquarters in May and the many online submissions didn’t yield enough scientific evidence in support of CBD, reported Informa Pharma Intelligence, a health care industry news source. At that hearing, an exchange between FDA analysts and a Colorado doctor underscored the problem. FDA officials asked Dr. Kevin Chapman, who was testifying on behalf of the American Epilepsy Society, how parents of epileptic children know how much CBD to give them. “They’re making it up as they go along,” Chapman said. The request for public comments about CBD research wasn’t much better, according to Mayl. “It’s safe to say that in 4,500 comments, we did not receive a lot of hard data around the issues that we specifically requested comments on,” Mayl told a group of attorneys and regulators at a conference on Monday. Law Blocked Research Mayl said the FDA recognizes that safety studies on CBD and other cannabis extracts were rare prior to hemp being descheduled as a controlled substance last December. The agency is open to being convinced through scientific data about the safety of CBD as an ingredient, Mayl said. Particularly, Mayl said, the agency needs to see total exposure data, as the use of CBD in the consumed products raises concerns about the potential risk to consumers. (Safety data related to the FDA-approved drug Epidiolex is not being considered in the agency’s evaluation of CBD safety for use in nondrug products.) Mayl reiterated comments made a week ago by Lowell Schiller, the FDA’s principal associate commissioner for policy, who told a gathering of nutritionists that there is no bias for or against CBD. “We do not hold CBD to a higher standard of safety – but we won’t hold it to a lower standard, either,” she said. The FDA also has to weigh whether or not the lawful use of CBD and other cannabis derivatives in food, beverages and dietary supplements will hinder further drug development, Mayl said. Read more about Mayl’s comments here . Original Article: https://hempindustrydaily.com/fda-says-more-scientific-data-needed-to-move-forward-with-cbd-regulation/
  • PSNet.biz
    Nov 21, 2019

    Industry Disturbed by DEA’s Involvement in Hemp Testing

    Discussion 
    Hemp farmers and industry advocates are alarmed that federal agriculture officials have brought drug enforcement back into the fold to ensure that cannabis produced for hemp in the United States does not exceed the acceptable limit of 0.3% THC. The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s  interim federal rules for hemp production , released Oct. 31, require that only laboratories registered with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) will be qualified to conduct THC testing of hemp crops. Industry members worry the limitation could delay THC testing and create bottlenecks, especially in remote areas far from a DEA-registered lab. “It appears that many of the existing (DEA) labs don’t have the equipment and capacity to service the hemp industry,” cannabis attorney Shawn Hauser of Denver-based firm Vicente Sederberg said last week  during a webcast with Hemp Industry Daily . The rules propose that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) may establish an approval process for labs that want to offer THC testing services. Those labs would need certification by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), which could be a suitable alternative, according to Hauser. If the USDA chooses to approve testing labs, it could accredit laboratories that perform to a certain quality, in addition to requiring a particular ISO accreditation. This is a departure for the DEA, which does not require labs to be accredited to handle narcotics. However, the USDA-approved labs would still have to be registered with the DEA. The alternate testing protocol “would give USDA the proper oversight of the laboratories doing the testing, providing quality assurance and control procedures that ensure a validated and qualified analysis, and defensible data,” the interim rules state. The USDA is requesting comments on the requirements for laboratories and will likely need to make changes regarding this issue, Hauser said. Lab Availability a Mystery The rules state that DEA-registered labs – and, potentially, USDA-approved labs –  will ultimately be listed on the Agriculture Department’s Domestic Hemp Production website. However, DEA spokeswoman Katherine Pfaff told Hemp Industry Daily  that agency policy conflicts with that statement. “DEA is still working through many of these details with USDA,” Pfaff wrote in an email to Hemp Industry Daily,  which asked about the testing plans. “We do not release information about specific DEA registrants, so we do not provide a list of labs registered with the DEA.” Meanwhile, laboratories looking for information on becoming DEA-registered to perform chemical analysis should visit the DEA Diversion Control Division website to apply for an analytical lab registration. Form DEA-225 should be used, according to Pfaff. DEA Anxiety For some, the idea that the DEA is involved at all is upsetting. Denver attorney Frank Robison said he counted the number of times DEA was mentioned in the rule. By his calculation, the agency had 42 mentions, compared with two references about banking. “It just shows that the priorities within the rule are skewed against the farmer in a way that would prohibit and restrict commerce as opposed to promoting commerce,” Robison told Hemp Industry Daily . “And, in my view, the intent of Congress is to promote a commercial environment and commercial industry for hemp. “We’re worried about 1,000 parts-per-million THC, when we should be worried about getting this industry off the ground and helping American farmers, providing them access to capital and making sure that their crops are insured.” Hemp industry consultant Ryan Pettigrew said it makes sense the DEA would be involved, considering that crops testing hot would technically be marijuana, which remains a Schedule 1 drug on the controlled substances list. “That one was obvious – there was really no argument to it,” Pettigrew told Hemp Industry Daily . “Granted, in a perfect world, they would just deregulate everything,” he continued. “But that’s just not going to happen.” The USDA predicted that about 20% of hemp samples collected in 2020 would exceed the 0.3% THC limit and need to be destroyed. The USDA rule lays out no plan to appeal testing results. Criminals, Not Farmers Robison contends that for the micro levels of THC involved with hemp production, the USDA shouldn’t have to involve drug law enforcement. “The USDA should have the capacity to manage 1,000 parts-per-million THC,” Robison said. The DEA should be focusing on drug criminals, not farmers, he said. “The folks that know how to work with crops are the people that should be managing the data and working with these farmers, not a law enforcement agency charged with pursuing crystal meth and fentanyl criminals,” Robison said. “They should not be even in the same ballpark.” Further, he continued, the U.S. Congress did not mean to scare farmers and put them on a watch list, but that’s the message the USDA rules send. Legitimate American farmers may have been sold “bogus seeds” or seeds that tested below 0.2% THC in Europe but went hot when grown in a warmer U.S. climate, he said. “Now, all of the sudden, because they wanted to be part of this congressionally opened-up market, why now are they in a DEA database?” Robison said. “Congress passed a law to promote the hemp industry in the United States of America,” he said. “The regs that just came down, the No. 1 thing that they accomplished, if I was a farmer, was to scare me and to provide me with a doubt of whether I should be entering this market until there is additional clarity about whether or not I’m committing a criminal activity.” Written By: Laura Drotleff Original Article: https://hempindustrydaily.com/the-dea-is-mentioned-42-times-hemp-industry-disturbed-by-agencys-involvement-in-thc-testing-rules/